The Attention Economy is Killing Cats
Between June 2024 and February 2025, cat torture videos on Chinese Telegram groups increased by 500 percent. A new video was uploaded every 2.5 hours on average. In just the first two months of 2025, over 500 new torture videos appeared - most from previously unknown abusers.
This explosion happened during the height of international activist attention. The protests. The CNN investigations. The viral outrage campaigns. The question nobody wants to ask: did the attention make things worse?
Abusers Want to Be Famous
Lara, a member of activist group Feline Guardians, admitted a hard truth in interviews with CNN: the abusers are "treated like celebrities" within their networks.
Inside dedicated chat rooms, the torturers call themselves "masters." Their paying customers are "sponsors." They compete for the most inventive methods of abuse. They livestream kills for tips. They bask in notoriety.
When international activists blast their faces across Twitter and news media, these people do not feel shame. They feel famous. Their status in the underground rises. New abusers see the attention and think: I want that too.
The Xu Zhihui Aftermath
In April 2023, food blogger Xu Zhihui tortured a black-and-white stray cat (called a "cow cat" for its markings) for three days. He starved it, cut its paws, and burned it alive. He filmed everything and shared it to cat abuse groups on QQ.
The video went viral. International outrage followed. Xu was detained for 14 days - not for animal abuse (no such law exists in China), but for "illegal capturing of property."
What happened next?
His fellow abusers threatened mass cat torture in retaliation, as reported by Spiel Times. They announced plans to livestream nationwide killing sprees. New videos appeared: cats in blenders, cats in microwaves.
The public spectacle did not deter them. It radicalized them.
The Vigilante Problem
In Suzhou, Chinese animal rights activists learned that a man named Li planned to adopt cats and livestream their deaths. They confronted him at a shopping mall, roughed him up, and extracted a confession.
The result? Police investigated both the abuser and the activists. Li faced scrutiny for animal cruelty. The activists faced potential assault charges. Nobody won.
This is what happens when you bypass legal systems for viral justice. You compromise the prosecution. You give abusers victim status. You create legal chaos that helps no one.
What Actually Works
The activists at Feline Guardians have documented cases where quiet cooperation with authorities produced results. When evidence is gathered carefully and submitted through proper channels - without tipping off targets via social media - arrests stick.
Chinese police have acted on animal abuse cases. They detained Xu Zhihui. They investigated the Wukong cat death. The system is weak, but it exists.
The moment you turn a case into an international viral spectacle, you:
1. Alert the target, who destroys evidence and disappears
2. Politicize the case, making cooperation between countries harder
3. Create martyrs in the abuser community
4. Generate copycat abusers seeking the same fame
The Numbers Do Not Lie
500% increase in torture videos during peak activism.
New videos every 2.5 hours.
Over 500 new videos in just two months.
Most from previously unknown abusers - meaning the attention created new perpetrators.
The correlation is damning. The attention is feeding the beast.
A Moral Disclaimer
This is not a call to ignore animal abuse. The suffering is real and the legal gap in China is a genuine injustice that deserves international pressure.
But pressure and spectacle are not the same thing. Diplomatic engagement, support for Chinese animal welfare organizations, and quiet law enforcement cooperation save lives. Viral outrage campaigns generate engagement metrics and new abusers.
If you care about cats more than you care about feeling righteous on social media, choose your tactics wisely. The numbers suggest the current approach is getting animals killed.
Last edited: